服務器:redhat as 4 2.6.9-22.ELsmp
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz
2G記憶體
160G SATA
客戶機:WINXP SP2
Intel(R) Pentium(r) 4 CPU 2.93GHz
1G記憶體
80G IDE硬碟
測試軟體:Load Runner 7.8
並發用戶數: 500
測試代碼:
<%@ page language=”java” import=”java.util.*” pageEncoding=”ISO-8859-1″%>
<%
String path = request.getContextPath();
String basePath = request.getScheme()+”://”+request.getServerName()+”:”+request.getServerPort()+path+”/”;
HashMap m = new HashMap();
for(int i=0;i<10000;i++)
m.put(i,i);
m.clear();
m = null;
%>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN”>
<html>
<head>
<base href=”<%=basePath%>”>
<title>My JSP ‘test.jsp’ starting page</title>
<meta http-equiv=”pragma” content=”no-cache”>
<meta http-equiv=”cache-control” content=”no-cache”>
<meta http-equiv=”expires” content=”0″>
<meta http-equiv=”keywords” content=”keyword1,keyword2,keyword3″>
<meta http-equiv=”description” content=”This is my page”>
<!–
<link rel=”stylesheet” type=”text/css” href=”styles.css”>
–>
</head>
<body>
This is my JSP page. <%=basePath%><br>
</body>
</html>
測試結果:
jetty 6.1.5
 |
分析摘要 |
周期: 30-09-2007 10:20:45 – 30-09-2007 10:21:09 |
方案名: |
Scenario1 |
---|
会话的结果文件: |
e:\Temp\res\res.lrr |
---|
持续时间: |
24秒. |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
index |
0.634 |
2.209 |
3.847 |
0.856 |
3.283 |
500 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resin pro 3.0.23
 |
分析摘要 |
周期: 30-09-2007 10:23:44 – 30-09-2007 10:24:15 |
方案名: |
Scenario1 |
---|
会话的结果文件: |
e:\Temp\res\res.lrr |
---|
持续时间: |
31秒. |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
index |
0.652 |
6.722 |
11.39 |
4.065 |
10.882 |
500 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
總結:
雖然這次測試比較簡單.但也應該可以體現出jetty性能比resin好一點.而且resin還購買了正版的licenses,沒有把tomcat加入測試.有時間再測試一個tomcat吧